- From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:13:12 -0500
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> > Unless this were part of the spec, I'm not sure clients would notice an > > Etag on a PROPPATCH response. Otherwise, that's a good idea. > > So we may want to add this to RFC2518bis (if a PROPPATCH modifies the etag, > it SHOULD be returned in a PROPPATCH response). Initially I'd say "We don't" because we have agreed previously that changing properties shouldn't change the etag. I'd rather keep the message to the reader as simple as that. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com I do not check nn621779@smallcue.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 17:15:39 UTC