Re: Bindings and Locks (was: bind draft issues)

On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:35  PM, Jason Crawford wrote:
> I suppose that covers it.  Hopefully the reader understands the 
> situations
> that
> that covers.

I'd like to vote in favor of providing enough specificity
that the reader will understand the situations it covers.
Are there any good arguments for not doing so?


>
> One question though... does it have to be a write-lock?  I suspect
> this precondition even applies to non-write locks.
>
>
>
-brian
briank@xythos.com

Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 13:41:03 UTC