- From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:35:21 -0500
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>
- Cc: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On Monday, 03/03/2003 at 04:24 EST, "Clemm, Geoff" <nngclemm___at___Rational.Com@smallcue.com> wrote: > Good point! > > I assume by "the binding being protected", you mean in the > case where the binding already exists, and the Overwrite:T > header is specifed? If so, I agree that we need another > precondition to handle this. How about: > > (DAV:locked-overwrite-allowed): If the collection already contains a binding > with the specified path segment, and if that binding is protected by a > write-lock, then the appropriate token MUST be specified in an If request > header. I suppose that covers it. Hopefully the reader understands the situations that that covers. One question though... does it have to be a write-lock? I suspect this precondition even applies to non-write locks.
Received on Monday, 3 March 2003 16:36:59 UTC