- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:59:48 -0800
- To: "'Stefan Eissing'" <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
OK, thanks all for the input. This will be in rfc2518 bis as SHOULD support strong Etags, with arguments supporting. > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Eissing > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:04 AM > To: 'Webdav WG' > Subject: Re: RFC2518 issue: requiring ETags (Atlanta wg mtg) > > > > I, again, agree with Geoff, Jason and Julian. > > //Stefan > > Am Donnerstag, 27.02.03, um 00:44 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Clemm, > Geoff: > > > > > And I agree with both Jason and Julian. > > > > Cheers, > > Geoff > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Crawford [mailto:nn683849@smallcue.com] > > > > > > Again, I agree with Julian. This doesn't look like chicken/egg > > problem to > > me. The check doesn't appear to be difficult/expensive for most > > clients > > and it's definitely valuable. > > > > If there is no reason for a client to believe that checking > the etag > > will > > create a breakage or incompatibility, clients will implement etag > > checking. > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 13:59:49 UTC