Re: RFC2518 issue: requiring ETags (Atlanta wg mtg)

I, again, agree with Geoff, Jason and Julian.

//Stefan

Am Donnerstag, 27.02.03, um 00:44 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Clemm, 
Geoff:

>
> And I agree with both Jason and Julian.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Crawford [mailto:nn683849@smallcue.com]
>
>
> Again, I agree with Julian.  This doesn't look like chicken/egg 
> problem to
> me.   The check doesn't appear to be difficult/expensive for most 
> clients
> and it's definitely valuable.
>
> If there is no reason for a client to believe that checking the etag 
> will
> create a breakage or incompatibility, clients will implement etag 
> checking.
>

Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 04:04:36 UTC