W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: Using If and not failing

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:08:16 +0100
To: "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCIEACGGAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 2:05 AM
> To: 'Julian Reschke'; 'Clemm, Geoff'; 'Webdav WG'
> Subject: RE: Using If and not failing
> > >  - Dan Brotsky saw these proposals and still felt strongly that a much
> > > more simple approach was necessary for long-term interoperability.
> >
> > I'd like to hear that directly from him, not as hear-say. In particular,
> > would be nice if the group of client programmers that thinks that there
> > an issue would actually sit down and try how the proposed usage of the
> > existing If header turns out to work.
> Please see:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2002OctDec/0118.html
> ...

I'm aware of the original mail.

Fact is, there has been extensive dicussion about this mail (with Dan *not*
returning to the list). We have tried to analyze the problem, and we have
made proposals how to achieve the desired semantics. I even posted a test

We are now waiting for feedback, in particular a discussion whether our
proposal works for the clients or not (in which case they need to explain
*why*). It seems to be impossible to get this kind of feedback. Until we get
it, I'd propose to consider this particular issue (how to let a request
succeed when the lock token is known, but the lock has gone away) as closed.


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Sunday, 2 February 2003 06:09:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:28 UTC