- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:13:00 +0200
- To: "Geoffrey M Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Geoffrey M Clemm > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:37 PM > To: 'Webdav WG' > Subject: RE: Issues: MKCOL_AND_302 > > > > Why do you think the answer is "a"? If the URL to which the > 302 is redirecting the client is not mapped to a resource, > a MKCOL to that URL can succeed (privileges permitting), so > I would conclude that "b" is the correct answer (and therefore, > MKCOL acts like any other method wrt 302 handling). But a user agent never would be able to automatically forward the MKCOL to the target, because MKCOL isn't a safe method, right? Julian
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 08:13:07 UTC