- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:34:25 -0800
- To: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>, "Daniel Brotsky" <dbrotsky@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> Geoff, Julian, are we sure we can't just define DAV:owner (rather than a > new field) more restrictively to comply with your Julian's proposal? We can't redefine DAV: owner. As you suggest, there are current deployed uses of DAV:owner and there would indeed be transition issues. > Lisa, Geoff, Julian, Can you think out the interoperability scenarios and > issues of Julian's proposal? (I wasn't at the interops so I'm > not familiar > with the current uses of DAV:owner and how Julian's proposal affects the > currently deployed systems and if there are transition issues.) Lisa
Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 12:40:03 UTC