- From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 10:07:04 -0500
- To: Daniel Brotsky <dbrotsky@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Julian's XLink based proposal sounds fine to me. Dan, I assume you understand and sympathize with Geoff's hesitance to having the server try to reveal the creator of the lock. Is there any other info about a lock that ACL's don't provide that you feel needs to be provided? Geoff, Julian, are we sure we can't just define DAV:owner (rather than a new field) more restrictively to comply with your Julian's proposal? Lisa, Geoff, Julian, Can you think out the interoperability scenarios and issues of Julian's proposal? (I wasn't at the interops so I'm not familiar with the current uses of DAV:owner and how Julian's proposal affects the currently deployed systems and if there are transition issues.) J. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com
Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 10:08:08 UTC