- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 21:42:21 +0200
- To: "Lisa Dusseault" <ldusseault@xythos.com>, "Webdav WG \(E-mail\)" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
I'm not convinced that this change is important. A URL is a URI. We just need to be clear about when a URI actually happens to be a *WebDAV* URI. That being said: > - Continue to define the property name as a URI in section 16. That section needs to be fixed anyway -- property names do not have URLs or URIs. Period. This should be put onto the issues list (Jim?). > ... > > I will not be able to get this done by the draft deadline > (Monday) since I'm > taking a long weekend to celebrate Canada Day ;) But I'll gather the > feedback after that and incorporate it later. There maybe a deadline for draft submissions before the IETF meeting, but does that mean that a new RFC2518bis draft needs to be submitted at all? I would have hoped that before a new draft is submitted, the issues *introduced* by the submission of the previous draft are actually resolved (or at least discussed). See <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2002JanMar/0185.html> and <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2002JanMar/0186.html>
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 15:42:54 UTC