W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: DASL - who wants to use it? (requirements spec?)

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:37:33 -0800
To: "Alan Kent" <ajk@mds.rmit.edu.au>, "WebDAV" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Not sure if anybody ever answered your basic question about whether DASL
addresses content querying.  It does.

Here is the query fragment that would search the body of a document:
  <D:contains>Peter Forsberg</D:contains>

This is similar to the property queries, but it does not name a property,
therefore it's the content that must be searched for the string.

Note that it's possible to do exact string matching ("Peter Forsberg") and
string-by-string matching ("Peter" and "Forsberg", not necessarily
together).  Section 5.13.1 of DASL shows both examples.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Alan Kent
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:25 AM
> To: WebDAV
> Subject: DASL - who wants to use it? (requirements spec?)
> I remember the recent question about DASL (was it this list?).
> I was wondering if part of the problem with DASL is the question
> of whether it addresses a need, or addresses it appropriately.
> We have a text searching engine that can do lots of funky searches
> etc. on the content of resources using fields (lets say dublin
> core elements). But this would be quite a different thing to
> querying on WebDAV properties.
> Hence I was interested to understand better the goal of DASL.
> Is it to be able to query WebDAV properities (and nothing else).
> Or was it intended to be broader and cover the harder problem
> of querying content as well?
> Just curious to understand the intended scope better before
> I jump in. I found a reference to a dasl requirements document
> (I have not looked it up yet). But is it still valid? I ask
> only because if its been a while and if no one has implemented
> it, is it because they have been busy, or because DASL has
> missed the mark in some way?
> Alan
> ps: I noticed that DASL seems to allow other queries to be
> plugged in. While this is good, for the above I am not after
> an answer like "you can do anything you like". I am more
> interested in "what do people like/want?"
> pps: I also noticed that the "basic" query langauge looked
> rather long when you got down to it - orderby, contains, like,
> three value logic... Convienient if you have an SQL engine around
> I guess.
Received on Monday, 17 December 2001 13:40:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:24 UTC