- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:42:39 +0100
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Correction: <namespace-URI, xml-local-node-name> This is basically what the XML namespace rec says. > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:31 AM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: RE: issue: XML Namespace Concatenation > > > I would want us to remove any reference to concatentation, > and to just say that a tag name is identified by the pair: > <namespace-URI, xml-node-name> > > Cheers, > Geoff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Crawford [mailto:ccjason@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:09 PM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: issue: XML Namespace Concatenation > > > > In a recent discussion, several people expressed dissatisfaction with > rfc2518 section 23.4 which says that the Namespace URI and the local part > are concatenated to determine the qualified tag name. I think > someone even > suggested that it was on the issues list and was going to be > changed. As I > look at the issues list, there is an item for it, but it doesn't look like > it was resolved to take any action. > > What's the verdict on this issue? > > ------------------------------------------ > Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com >
Received on Friday, 30 November 2001 03:43:03 UTC