- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:25:17 +0200
- To: fielding@eBuilt.com, ejw@cse.ucsc.edu
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, uri@w3.org
> > So, you could still have "http:" and two additional > URI/URL/URNs for the > > version-specific definitions of the http URL space. > > Yes, but only if we defined it to be such a thing, which we > won't do because > Web browsers still discard the scheme name if it is the same > as the scheme > of the referring document. What makes you think that web browsers are the only (or even primary) agents utilizing a "scheme:" URI approach? And what's to say that web browsers should be discarding the scheme? Patrick
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2001 07:25:25 UTC