- From: Daniel Brotsky <dbrotsky@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:30:37 -0800
- To: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
1. I agree with Julian that we should make the 2518 revise be namespace-compliant. 2. I agree with Julian's suggestion that we table this for a few weeks while Lisa and others try again to get the "DAV:" string made an acceptable namespace. 3. If we can't get "DAV:" accepted, I agree with using Jason's suggestion: At 11:06 AM -0500 11/23/01, Jason Crawford wrote: >1) We pick a second URI for our namespace. I'll suggest >http://webdav.org/base. >2) We update the spec to use this new URI in the examples. >3) We deprecate DAV: as the namespace URI in the spec. >4) ASAP implementors start accepting the new URI in addition to DAV: >5) Later implementors can start transmitting the new URI. FWIW, I believe that making this change *will* eventually cause older DAV clients and servers to stop working, which I think was something Lisa raised in a different way. I believe this because I think eventually the cost-savings of using common namespace-processing technology will cause the hand-written backwards-compatibly-accept-DAV: patches to become too expensive, at which point they will go away. So 4. I agree that we will need an indicator (in OPTIONS) of spec-revision, and I believe that servers which *don't* accept "DAV:" should indicate that they are not "DAV servers" using the indicators that older clients look for. dan -- Daniel Brotsky, Adobe Systems tel 408-536-4150, pager 877-704-4062 2-way pager email: <mailto:page-dbrotsky@adobe.com>
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2001 12:32:33 UTC