- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 09:56:57 +0100
- To: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Matt Timmermans
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:08 PM
>
> [...]
>
> This URI encoding scheme preserves element identity in accordance with
> XMLNS, while maintaining backward compatability for these
> existing systems.
> Microsoft is the only implementor I know of that makes extensive use of
> property URIs (I think they use them a lot in their DASL implementation).
> It's just one implementor, but it's an important one, and they
> already have
> an encoding scheme for property URIs that makes some sense.
>
> If we must have an encoding scheme for property URIs, and I think we must,
> then it would help interoperability to conform to Microsoft's wherever
> possible.
Sorry, I must have missed that. Why do we need property URIs as compared
to identifiers like {namespaceuri}localname? In which specification are
they used?
//Stefan
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 03:55:50 UTC