RE: content type for WebDAV request/response bodies, was: [ACL] Access Control Protocol -07 submitted

• From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:49:54 +0100
• To: <mtimmerm@opentext.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Lisa Dusseault'" <lisa@xythos.com>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCGEDJDIAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: Matt Timmermans [mailto:mtimmerm@opentext.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:08 PM
> To: 'Julian Reschke'; 'Lisa Dusseault'; 'WebDAV'
> Subject: RE: content type for WebDAV request/response bodies, was: [ACL]
> Access Control Protocol -07 submitted
>
> ...
>
> If we must have an encoding scheme for property URIs, and I think we must,
> then it would help interoperability to conform to Microsoft's wherever
> possible.

Why do you think that we need an encoding scheme?

And does the encoding scheme need to produce URIs, or will any Unicode
string do?

I think that identifying properties using the pair (namespace name, local
name) is just fine, and how a server treats this internally shouldn't be of
any concern to the spec.

Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 14:50:29 UTC