W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: [ACL] Principal Identity

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:26:13 +0100
To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, "Stefan Eissing" <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>, "Webdav WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCCEAPDIAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

I think that's a bit pessimistic.

Neither deltaV nor ACL say anything about a behavorial change in PROPFIND
for dead properties.

I agree that better protocol over selection (exclude lists? by namespace?)
might be nice.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:40 AM
> To: Stefan Eissing; Jim Whitehead; Webdav WG
> Subject: RE: [ACL] Principal Identity
> > The nice thing about allprop is that you get all the dead properties.
> > The bad thing about allprop is that you cannot see if a resource is
> > versioned/version or which methods it does support.
> How do you know you can get all the dead properties?  'allprop' as defined
> in RFC2518 seems to have to change, yet we've not clearly defined a new
> behaviour.  In the meantime, I don't believe clients can rely on getting
> anything back in 'allprop' except the live properties defined in RFC2518.
> Lisa
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 15:26:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:24 UTC