- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:26:13 +0100
- To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, "Stefan Eissing" <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>, "Webdav WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Lisa, I think that's a bit pessimistic. Neither deltaV nor ACL say anything about a behavorial change in PROPFIND for dead properties. I agree that better protocol over selection (exclude lists? by namespace?) might be nice. Julian > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:40 AM > To: Stefan Eissing; Jim Whitehead; Webdav WG > Subject: RE: [ACL] Principal Identity > > > > > > The nice thing about allprop is that you get all the dead properties. > > The bad thing about allprop is that you cannot see if a resource is > > versioned/version or which methods it does support. > > How do you know you can get all the dead properties? 'allprop' as defined > in RFC2518 seems to have to change, yet we've not clearly defined a new > behaviour. In the meantime, I don't believe clients can rely on getting > anything back in 'allprop' except the live properties defined in RFC2518. > > Lisa >
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 15:26:48 UTC