- From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:16:13 -0400
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>
- Cc: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
<< If this were added, it would be reasonable to require a client to issue the UNLOCK against the locked URL. The alternative is to allow the UNLOCK to be applied to any URL that identifies a resource that is affected by the lock. I could live with that, if the working group prefers it, but I prefer the "must unlock the locked URL" approach. >> I'd even be comfortable with the approach that you don't even have to say where the lock is. The lock is supposed to be globally unique. And if the client wants to verify that it understands where the lock is, it could use an IF header. (Actually right now the IF header is used for UNLOCK, but changing that is on the issues list.) Of course if we feel the *server* *always* needs to verify the client's knowledge of the lock location, I can live with that too. J.
Received on Friday, 24 August 2001 11:45:03 UTC