- From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:38:23 -0500
- To: "Kevin Wiggen" <wiggs@wiggenout.com>
- Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
I agree that rfc2616 doesn't say nearly enough about OPTIONS and Allow:. I do wish it would say for example if OPTIONS should list GET on a resource that will return 404 Not Found for a GET on that URI. Or not list GET. Or if OPTIONS itself should return 404. (As per jigsaw.) That would give us a feel for the philosophy behind OPTIONS. Their current philosophy seems to be to say little about OPTIONS and that's why I suggested that we do the same. Anyone else have any opinions on this J. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2001 15:51:24 UTC