- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@Rational.Com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 16:29:00 -0500
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
I agree with Tim. Furthermore, I would suggest that the example use the DAV:urn property (aka DAV:resource-id), since that illustrates the value of the DAV:urn property (the DAV:display-name is not a reliable way of identifying a resource). Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI [mailto:Tim_Ellison@oti.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 3:29 PM To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: Loop Detected The example given in section 12.1 of draft-ietf-webdav-binding-protocol-02 of a PROPFIND depth infinity in the presence of a loop implies that the propstat for the loop detected resource only contains the property names and not their values (again). Although I can understand the point of this in the majority of cases, it does prevent the client from reconstructing the graph of resources since they cannot determine the destination of the binding. If the properties were returned the client could PROPFIND depth infinity on the resource identifier and reconstruct the graph. Tim
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2000 16:29:48 UTC