- From: Juergen Reuter <reuterj@ira.uka.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:29:00 +0200
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
- cc: reuterj@ira.uka.de, jjh@ira.uka.de
Please, remember that:
"Multiple message-header fields with the same field-name may be
present in a message if and only if the entire field-value for that
header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)]"
(RFC 2068, section 4.2).
Hence, following Geoffrey's thoughts, it may be reasonable to redefine
the Lock-Token header as follows:
Lock-Token = "Lock-Token" ":" 1#Coded-URL
Bye,
Juergen
Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote:
> The answer I'd like us to make is that you can include an arbitrary
> number of Lock-Token headers with a request
> ...
jamsden@us.ibm.com wrote:
> That's because 1) you can't mix tagged and
> non-tagged lists in the same If header
> ...
Received on Thursday, 13 April 2000 16:29:08 UTC