- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:10:30 -0800
- To: WEBDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Caught by the spam filter. - Jim -----Original Message----- From: John Stracke [mailto:francis@ecal.com] Sent: Friday, February 26, 1999 10:20 AM To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: Issue #5: compound DAV:resourcetype property for references. ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Jim Davis <jdavis@parc.xerox.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 10:03:30 PST >but as for the reftarget, my intuition says it does not part of the "type". > if I have two different references, with different targets, but otherwise >the same (both are direct references with no integrity) then they should be >exactly the same "resourcetype". I agree. The reftarget is more like content. The way I think of it is that, if two objects have different types, you may require different code to work with them. Different reftargets don't require different code. -- /=============================================================\ |John Stracke | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK | |francis@ecal.com|============================================| |Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed | |eCal, Inc. | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch | \=============================================================/ --
Received on Monday, 8 March 1999 17:26:12 UTC