- From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 18:14:24 +0000
- To: ccjason@us.ibm.com
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
ccjason@us.ibm.com wrote: > rfc2518 8.3.1 talks about MKCOL and says... > > [...] For example, if a request to create > collection /a/b/c/d/ is made, and neither /a/b/ nor /a/b/c/ exists, > the request must fail. > > That last sentence (For example...) strikes me as wrong. It seems > to suggest that if one of these existed, then you might not need to > fail the request. The sentence is correct, but confusing. (I think I had to go back over it the first time I read it, too.) I agree that's that what it seems to suggest, but it doesn't actually mean that. It's just giving one scenario where the request must fail; it doesn't say anything about when it should succeed. It might be best to simplify the example, changing "and neither /a/b/ nor /a/b/c/ exists" to "and /a/b/c/ does not exist". -- /=============================================================\ |John Stracke | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK | |francis@ecal.com|============================================| |Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed | |eCal Corp. | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch | \=============================================================/
Received on Thursday, 17 June 1999 14:14:48 UTC