W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1998

Hierarchy in WebDAV

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 14:33:00 -0800
Message-ID: <3FF8121C9B6DD111812100805F31FC0D08792BF8@RED-MSG-59>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Cc: ejw@ics.uci.edu, WEBDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
This post is in response to Roy's post

Roy's argument, as I understand it, is that maintaining an hierarchical
namespace is a policy decision, not a protocol decision. By requiring a
server to maintain a consistent namespace in certain circumstances, we are
dictating how a server is implemented rather than confining ourselves to
defining the meaning of the bytes going over the wire. This argument
resonates strongly with me as I made very similar arguments about a number
of requirements in the HTTP spec (most of which, to the credit of the
tireless efforts of Jim "The Editor" Gettys, were later downgraded from
MUST/SHOULD to must/should).

I provide the explanation, as I understand it, for how this requirement end
up in WebDAV in section 7 of

Received on Sunday, 27 December 1998 17:33:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:15 UTC