- From: John Stracke <francis@netscape.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 14:25:44 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Jim Davis wrote (some time ago--I'm still catching up from email that came in while I was on sabbatical): > The spec (13.5) does not say whether the DAV:getcontenttype property is > readonly or not. In mod_dav it is, in PyDAV it is not. > > I claim it should not be read-only, as the client (who stored the resource > via PUT) has better knowledge of the server (which can, at best, be relying > on resource name heuristics to guess the content type). Shouldn't the server save the value of the Content-Type: that came in on the PUT? -- /======================================================================\ |John (Francis) Stracke |My opinions are my own.| S/MIME supported | |Software Retrophrenologist|===========================================| |Netscape Comm. Corp. |Almost no one has ever wanted a 1/4" drill | |francis@netscape.com | bit; all they ever wanted was a 1/4" hole.| \======================================================================/
Received on Friday, 18 December 1998 17:25:55 UTC