W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1998

RE: Execute rights

From: <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 13:40:16 -0500
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <852566BF.006700F5.00@us.ibm.com>

Sounds good to me.

w3c-dist-auth@w3.org on 11/17/98 11:42:14 AM

To:   "'Joe Orton'" <jeo101@york.ac.uk>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
cc:    (bcc: Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM)
Subject:  RE: Execute rights

This seems to be fairly useful -- of course, the ACL protocol does allow
extension of the access control rights by adding XML namespacse, if the WG
as a whole doesn't want to do "execute" rights.  Any other input on this


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Orton [mailto:jeo101@york.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 6:56 AM
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: Execute rights

Would it be a good idea to add 'execute' rights to the ACL protocol, to
indicate whether a principal is allowed to execute a resource (e.g.
CGI scripts).

Or should this be implemented as live properties? Seems more appropriate
in the ACL protocol to me.



Joe Orton
jeo101@york.ac.uk ... joe@orton.demon.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 1998 13:45:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:15 UTC