- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 20:30:55 PST
- To: "Yaron Goland" <yarong@microsoft.com>, "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>, <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
- Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> >Roy Fielding agreed: > >> I'll agree with Larry here -- I've been staying out of the debate > >> largely because I don't understand the need for the requirement at all. > > > >The only problem is that I don't understand what constraint > they're talking > >about! Is this a discussion of case sensitivity, or namespace > consistency? > > My comment was regarding the requirement that DAV capable resources be > within a DAV collection. Urk! That wasn't what I was complaining about. The requirement I don't understand is the requirement that a resource not appear twice in a collection. I don't understand the reason for the requirement. If I understood the reason for the requirement, then I might know why it should be OK for the same 'resource' to appear in a collection twice if that resource is named with different URLs.
Received on Thursday, 12 November 1998 23:31:15 UTC