- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 09:25:11 -0400
- To: John Stracke <francis@netscape.com>, WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
At 05:46 PM 10/5/98 -0700, John Stracke wrote: >At the versioning design team meeting last week, Jim asked >if we wanted to express the revision history (version graph) >in RDF; it's a natural format for it, but there was concern >that we might be tying ourselves to a doomed non-standard--a >few people expressed the opinion that RDF seemed to be dying >on the vine, ignored by the W3C Those who who may have expressed the view that W3C could be abandoning RDF are sorely mistaken. The RDF Model and Syntax Working Group continues to refine its specification based on comments on the most recent public working draft (dated 19 August). See http://www.w3.org/TR/ We hope to declare a 'Last Call' review for the RDF Model and Syntax specification in a single-digit number of days and for the RDF Schema specification shortly thereafter. -Ralph R. Swick W3C/MIT
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 1998 09:25:21 UTC