- From: John Stracke <francis@netscape.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 16:27:43 -0700
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Jim Amsden wrote: > This will require ACLs on individual properties, Nope. The backpointer update doesn't have to pass through the same code path as PROPPATCH; it can call directly into the code that PROPPATCH calls, but bypass the ACL check. >> I don't believe that has to be a problem. The ACLs can be set up so that they >> specifically permit the backpointer property to be updated by the server. > -- /====================================================================\ |John (Francis) Stracke |My opinions are my own.|S/MIME supported | |Software Retrophrenologist|=========================================| |Netscape Comm. Corp. |The good are innocent and create justice.| |francis@netscape.com |The bad are guilty, and invent mercy. | \====================================================================/ New area code for work number: 650
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 1998 19:27:22 UTC