- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 20:43:56 PDT
- To: "Jim Davis" <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>, "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> > I think we should require all collections below a DAV-compliant > >resource to also be DAV-compliant. So, while it's OK to not be > >DAV-compliant looking up a hierarchy tree, looking down the tree from a > >DAV-compliant location should always be DAV-compliant. > > Strongly agree. So a DAV-compliant resource can't be, say, a CGI script? Even in 'advanced DAV'? If I have http://a/b/c/ and I want to add a CGI such that http://a/b/c/d is indirectly http://a/b/c/d.cgi, where 'd.cgi' computes a query, you might have http://a/b/c/d?e . Now, is http://a/b/c/d.cgi a 'member' of http://a/b/c/ ? Larry -- http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinter > >
Received on Monday, 14 September 1998 23:44:52 UTC