- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 13:33:59 -0800
- To: "'Dylan Barrell'" <dbarrell@opentext.ch>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Based on consensus created in this group since the release of the last version of the specification the DTD for activelock is now: <!ELEMENT activelock (locktype, lockscope, depth, owner?, timeout?, locktoken?) > locktype, lockscope, and depth are not optional because if all are not specified then the lock information will be inaccurate. As such if a server does not wish to return one of those three elements then it MUST NOT return the activelock entry at all, which of course, is its right. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: Dylan Barrell [SMTP:dbarrell@opentext.ch] > Sent: Monday, February 09, 1998 7:35 AM > To: 'WebDAV' > Subject: 11.1 activelock element > > surely this element should be defined as follows > > <!ELEMENT activelock (locktype?, lockscope?, depth?, owner?, timeout?, > locktoken?) > > > as the server is free to withold any of this information. > > Cheers > Dylan
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 1998 16:34:32 UTC