RE: Comments: DAV Specification 0.2

I agree. Anyone know where they are? I get mine from an internal MS
site.
		Yaron

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Corprew Reed [SMTP:CorprewR@saros.com]
>Sent:	Tuesday, November 12, 1996 10:34 AM
>To:	'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org'
>Cc:	Yaron Goland; Bernard Chester
>Subject:	RE: Comments: DAV Specification 0.2
>
>BC = "Bernard Chester <BernardC@Saros.com>"
>YG = "Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>"
>
>BC>SiteMaps are not yet an accepted mechanism of HTML; this
>specification
>BC>is dependent on them.  What are other alternatives? 
>>YG>[Yaron Goland]  WebMaps (new name for SiteMaps) have gained a lot of
>>YG>acceptance in the W3C and they meet our needs very nicely. However
>>they are
>>YG>just another content type and their use is optional. However if we
>>don't like
>>YG>WebMaps then we need to define some default to act as the common
>denominator.
>
>The current specification for WebMaps/SiteMaps and other 
>proposals should be included in the references section of the draft.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Corprew
>
>corprew reed
>software engineer / applications solutions
>corprewr@saros.com
>saros business unit, filenet corporation
>http://www.saros.com
>phone:  206.646.1066
>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 12 November 1996 20:18:50 UTC