- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 12:34:13 PST
- To: slein@wrc.xerox.com
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
# If there are cases where variants are NOT computed on the fly, what should # happen when someone creates a new version of the resource (by editing one of # the variants)? I assume the user would normally prefer for the other # variants to be brought into synch automatically -- for new versions of them # to be generated from the one he submitted. Do we want to do anything to # support this? It depends on how the variants are computed. If they can be automatically generated, you might want to update them automatically, but the state of language translation software, for example, isn't really up to automatically regenerating the French page from a new version of the English page, for example. Since there's not a general solution, the question is whether we need or want to do anything in the protocol. I don't think so. An update (POST or whatever) to http://host.dom/dir/resource.en.html might or might not automatically affect the version of http://host.dom/dir/resource.fr.html but it probably _does_ affect the version of the (content-negotiated) http://host.dom/dir/resource.html analogous to the situation that when you update chapter 1 of the book, you automatically update the whole book. Another way to think of a resource that has variants that are not independently named as "multipart/alternative" content: all of the variations are there. Think of a resource that has multiple parts as "multpart/mixed". Larry
Received on Thursday, 31 October 1996 16:34:41 UTC