Re: [art] [Uri-review] Re: Alternative representation of URIs in YANG

On Thu, Jan 29, 2026, at 01:56, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Martin, this all began due to an AUTH48 expert-review request from 
> IANA, to which you raised a concern for the "ietf-uri" module, which is 
> no longer, which is fine.  Can we unblock the RFC Editor now?

Sure.  As expert, there's no reason to hold this.

(As someone who cares about the technical value of RFCs, I find the design - and its articulation - poor, but that's no reason to hold things up as registry expert.)

Received on Thursday, 29 January 2026 00:24:43 UTC