- From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 10:06:02 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, uri@w3.org
First match wins. Every time. > On 07/10/2022 9:31 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > > Am 10.07.2022 um 15:08 schrieb Timothy Mcsweeney: > > > >> On 07/09/2022 7:55 PM Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Timothy, > >> > >> You can try and bend the rules of the specification as much as you want, > >> but if you don't follow the defined parsing rules, existing internet > >> infrastructure will simply not support your new scheme. > > > > > > There is an errata[1] for the parsing in Appendix B of RFC3986. > > [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7019 > > Yes, you should just posted it, and it should be rejected due to it > being ... (I fail to find a polite word for that, so I'll leave it at that). > > Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 10 July 2022 14:06:18 UTC