It bounced sort of, trying again with fewer recipients? From: Shawn Steele [mailto:Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 9:15 AM To: Mark Davis ☕; Anne van Kesteren Cc: Gervase Markham; yaojk; Paul Hoffman; PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG; uri@w3.org; John C Klensin; IDNA update work; www-tag.w3.org Subject: RE: Standardizing on IDNA 2003 in the URL Standard > UTS 46 will stay around, if only for the mapping layer. > Whether the rest would be used by clients really depends on the progress made by registries. > As for the deviation-character support, I think implementations could stop supporting them if the affected > registries enforced bundle-or-block. I’m not sure that’s trivial. Would all of the next layers enforce them? (Blogspot.com for example, I have no clue what, if anything, blogspot does for IDN, but it’s a place that allows random users to create domain names). How would we know? Some of the registrars also originally stated that they didn’t want to bundle. > As to the additional symbols, implementations could stop supporting them if the registries forbade them. Same thing. -Shawn Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 17:19:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:57 UTC