- From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 05:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
- Cc: "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 12:47:10 UTC
go look here for alternate view: http://www.loc.gov/marc/organizations/orgshome.html#struct http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4647 too. The idea of unlimited scheme names does not sit well with me, personally: imagine a URI for the number pi. PI = one number =one URI, pi is irrational with boundless digits. Location (on a number line) and identification are different properties. --Gannon ________________________________ From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> To: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Cc: uri@w3.org Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 3:14 AM Subject: Re: limit to length of scheme name? There is no limit on scheme name length. ....Roy On Sep 2, 2013, at 6:00 PM, =JeffH wrote: > Hi, > > I've perused RFCs 3986 and 4395, and do not see any length limitation for scheme names -- none is specified? (not a criticism, just a yes/no(-go-look-here) sort of question) > > thanks, > > =JeffH >
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 12:47:10 UTC