W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > September 2013

Re: limit to length of scheme name?

From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 05:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1378212401.35434.YahooMailNeo@web122901.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
Cc: "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>
go look here for alternate view: http://www.loc.gov/marc/organizations/orgshome.html#struct
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4647 too.  The idea of unlimited scheme names does not sit well with me, personally: imagine a URI for the number pi.  PI = one number =one URI, pi is irrational with boundless digits.  Location (on a number line) and identification are different properties.
--Gannon




________________________________
 From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
To: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> 
Cc: uri@w3.org 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: limit to length of scheme name?
 

There is no limit on scheme name length.

....Roy

On Sep 2, 2013, at 6:00 PM, =JeffH wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've perused RFCs 3986 and 4395, and do not see any length limitation for scheme names -- none is specified?  (not a criticism, just a yes/no(-go-look-here) sort of question)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> =JeffH
> 
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 12:47:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:16 UTC