Re: Another idea for URI templates

On Oct 25, 2011, at 2:46 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> I don’t have the URI template draft handy unfortunately (on a long flight), so I can’t confirm this, but I think I found something useful that I don’t believe the template draft currently handles.
> 
> If you have a template that includes “/{foo}”, then the “/” is always inserted into the template regardless of whether or not “foo” is actually defined.  It might be nice to have the “/” be there only if “foo” is set.

That is exactly what is defined for {/foo}.

....Roy