- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:25:21 +1000
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, uri@w3.org, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Hi Philippe. On 22/06/2011, at 5:01 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I'd like to check with you my understanding of RFC 4395 [1]. > > The FIle API specification contains the definition of the blob URI > scheme [2]. Following the registration procedure, my understanding is > that: > 1- Arun should reformat section 6.7.1 [2] (or include a new section) to > follow the template at [3]; FWIW I'd put the template in an appendix. > 2- Once our specification is in LC, Arun should send an email to > uri-review@ietf.org asking for review (and address whatever comments > come out of that); What status are you going for -- permanent or provisional? > 3- At CR, Arun should request registration from IANA (iana@iana.org), > asking for provisional status; > 4- At PR (or REC?), Arun should request permanent status from IANA. I'll check into this. Cheers, > > Do you concur with those steps? > > Philippe > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#page-9 > [2] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#ABNFForBlob > [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#section-5.4 > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 22:26:00 UTC