- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:32:15 -0800
- To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
- Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:20 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Since these schemes are in Provisional category, it means that they are 'waiting for specification'. If no-one specifies them, they should be moved to Historical. That's clear, IMO. No, they should be removed from the registry and allowed to be defined by some other spec in the future. There is no need to reserve the schemes of unimplemented identifier mechanisms. ....Roy
Received on Monday, 31 January 2011 19:32:46 UTC