W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2011

Re: The state of 'afs' URi scheme

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:32:15 -0800
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <321C12D4-7F60-48DC-A0D2-54682DFA5D18@gbiv.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:20 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> Since these schemes are in Provisional category, it means that they are 'waiting for specification'.  If no-one specifies them, they should be moved to Historical.  That's clear, IMO.

No, they should be removed from the registry and allowed to be
defined by some other spec in the future.  There is no need to
reserve the schemes of unimplemented identifier mechanisms.

....Roy
Received on Monday, 31 January 2011 19:32:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:14 UTC