W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2011

The state of 'afs' URi scheme

From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:29:25 +0200
Message-ID: <4D2C7755.5080908@gmail.com>
To: uri@w3.org
Dear all,

I have posted the following message on 7 January:
> Dear all,
> Let me briefly summarize all the comments on 'afs' URI scheme. Firstly,
> those referring to OpenAFS, forget that AFS is not only network service,
> but just file system. If we move this scheme to historic, there will be
> no harm to those who use it. Moreover, I should repeat here that moving
> the scheme to Historic does not mean restricting them to be used. If
> smbd still uses it, they will continue to do this. But it's impossible,
> as there is no clients for AFS as *network service*.
> I personally think we should move it to Historic to indicate it is not
> used among the Internet and is outdated. So what we decide on 'afs' URI
> scheme?
> All the best,
> Mykyta Yevstifeyev
and have not received any responses yet. Should I consider that as the 
'silent agreement'?

Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 15:29:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:54 UTC