W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Status of RFC 1738 -- 'ftp' URI scheme

From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:45:05 -0500
To: Michael Wojcik <Michael.Wojcik@microfocus.com>
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110108014505.GA23339@mercury.ccil.org>
Michael Wojcik scripsit:

> But obviously some users (possibly the majority) *would* want a
> file-scheme URI treated as a UNC name. And while I might argue that the
> principle of least surprise, the principle of least privilege, and a
> bias toward security all argue against that, those are arguments that
> historically have not had a lot of traction among casual users or
> implementors of the software they use.

Please do argue, because I don't see how they apply.

> 
> I suppose what I'm saying, then, is that I don't believe it's clear that
> the UNC-mapping behavior is necessarily desirable, and more discussion
> on the topic might be called for, if we're trying to standardize the
> file scheme.

I think that's what we are doing.

-- 
John Cowan    cowan@ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
Nobody expects the RESTifarian Inquisition!  Our chief weapon is
surprise ... surprise and tedium  ... tedium and surprise ....
Our two weapons are tedium and surprise ... and ruthless disregard
for unpleasant facts....  Our three weapons are tedium, surprise, and
ruthless disregard ... and an almost fanatical devotion to Roy Fielding....
Received on Saturday, 8 January 2011 01:45:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:14 UTC