W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2011

RE: Status of RFC 1738 -- 'ftp' URI scheme

From: Michael Wojcik <Michael.Wojcik@microfocus.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 05:47:43 -0800
Message-ID: <81F42F63D5BB344ABF294F8E80990C7902782B7C@MTV-EXCHANGE.microfocus.com>
To: "URI" <uri@w3.org>
> From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev [mailto:evnikita2@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2011 01:09
> 
> 03.01.2011 16:02, Michael Wojcik wrote:
> >
> > I don't know whether there are any clients that support afs-
> > scheme URLs.
>
> That is the most important. If there is no interest of implementators,
> do we need such scheme. Moreover, if the scheme is Historic, that does
> not mean that it is *restricted* to be used. Historic status means
that
> smth. is *not intended* to be used rather that forbidden. So there is
> more sense to move this scheme to historic rather than specify it.

Agreed. Unless someone can identify a client that uses afs-scheme URLs,
relegating it to Historic status appears to be appropriate.

-- 
Michael Wojcik
Principal Software Systems Developer, Micro Focus




This message has been scanned for viruses by MailController - www.MailController.altohiway.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2011 13:49:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:14 UTC