- From: Michael Wojcik <Michael.Wojcik@microfocus.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 05:47:43 -0800
- To: "URI" <uri@w3.org>
> From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev [mailto:evnikita2@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2011 01:09 > > 03.01.2011 16:02, Michael Wojcik wrote: > > > > I don't know whether there are any clients that support afs- > > scheme URLs. > > That is the most important. If there is no interest of implementators, > do we need such scheme. Moreover, if the scheme is Historic, that does > not mean that it is *restricted* to be used. Historic status means that > smth. is *not intended* to be used rather that forbidden. So there is > more sense to move this scheme to historic rather than specify it. Agreed. Unless someone can identify a client that uses afs-scheme URLs, relegating it to Historic status appears to be appropriate. -- Michael Wojcik Principal Software Systems Developer, Micro Focus This message has been scanned for viruses by MailController - www.MailController.altohiway.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2011 13:49:13 UTC