Re: The state of 'afs' URi scheme from Mykyta Yevstifeyev on 2011-02-01 (uri@w3.org from February 2011)

From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:22:14 +0200
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
CC: URI <uri@w3.org>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <4D47DED6.6070901@gmail.com>

31.01.2011 21:32, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:20 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>> Since these schemes are in Provisional category, it means that they are 'waiting for specification'.  If no-one specifies them, they should be moved to Historical.  That's clear, IMO.
> No, they should be removed from the registry and allowed to be
> defined by some other spec in the future.  There is no need to
> reserve the schemes of unimplemented identifier mechanisms.
Roy,

Firstly, are there any procedures for de-assignment of URI schemes 
registration, as you propose.  Moreover, Provisional category provides 
the state 'waiting for proper specification'.  Finally, re-read the 
definition of Historical category and the definition of Provisional 
category.  And then make the conclusions.

Mykyta
> ....Roy
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 10:22:27 UTC