Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> · Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:41:30 +0300

Frank, all,

20.08.2011 10:25, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
> Author/Change controller:
>     IESG (the transition from a "provisional" to "historical" status is
>     not covered by BCP 35 section 5.3; maybe the pack: scheme could be
>     simply identified as "non-URI" and removed from the scheme registry).

I suppose this is the best possible way, even despites RFC 4395 has no 
mention of how this can be done.  As you've mentioned before, 'pack' 
URIs aren't 3986-compatible; this means that they aren't URIs in context 
of the current in-force-standard.  Anyway, Andrey Shur was declared to 
be "Change controller", and he will have to accept such action.  I'm 
cc'ing this message to draft-shur-pack-uri-scheme@tools.ietf.org; so 
let's wait the authors to act.

Mykyta

> References:
>     STD 66 (RFC 3986), I-D.shur-pack-uri-scheme-05 (same as -03 and -04).
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>