- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:15:16 -0800
- To: Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>
- Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>
On Mar 6, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Joe Gregorio wrote:
> Just checking, I believe that the following are all legal URI Templates according to the latest revision:
>
> {2}
> {%20}
> {☄}
>
> Which does lead to the question of whether
> the following are equivalent templates:
>
> {a}
> {%61}
I think they should be equivalent -- will need to note that
in the variable name parser.
> Previous drafts used
>
> varname = (ALPHA / DIGIT)*(ALPHA / DIGIT / "." / "_" / "-" )
>
> which avoided this ambiguity.
Yes, I gave in to the requests for full i18n support since
some people might want to use them in non-LTR character encoded
documents. *shrug*
....Roy
Received on Sunday, 7 March 2010 01:15:47 UTC