- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:15:16 -0800
- To: Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>
- Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>
On Mar 6, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Joe Gregorio wrote: > Just checking, I believe that the following are all legal URI Templates according to the latest revision: > > {2} > {%20} > {☄} > > Which does lead to the question of whether > the following are equivalent templates: > > {a} > {%61} I think they should be equivalent -- will need to note that in the variable name parser. > Previous drafts used > > varname = (ALPHA / DIGIT)*(ALPHA / DIGIT / "." / "_" / "-" ) > > which avoided this ambiguity. Yes, I gave in to the requests for full i18n support since some people might want to use them in non-LTR character encoded documents. *shrug* ....Roy
Received on Sunday, 7 March 2010 01:15:47 UTC