- From: Florent Georges <lists@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
- To: uri@w3.org
[[ sorry for reposting, the original email seems to have been truncated by my MUA ]] Hi, I have a comment about the URI Template draft document 04. For now, it seems the goal is to be able to construct an actual URI from a URI Template and a set of variable values. For instance: http://example.com/~{username}/ + { username: me } => http://example.com/~me/ But is it also intended to give the value of all variable parts given a template and an actual URI? As well of course whether an actual URI does match or not a specific template. For instance: http://example.com/~{username}/ + http://example.com/~me/ => { username: me } http://example.com/~{username}/ + http://example.com/that/ => <does not match> A patrticular use case would be a descriptor describing the dispatching between several resources based on URIs. E.g. the web.xml descriptor in Java EE defines a link between URI (with a specific format of URI patterns) and Java Servlet: <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>ThatServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/that/</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>UserServlet</servlet-name> <!-- cannot do something as precise as "~*" --> <url-pattern>/users/*</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping> Basically, when the server receives an HTTP request, on one specific URI, it looks for the first match of the above mappings and selects the corresponding servlet. Using the URI Template format, that would gives something like the following, setting automatically the variable "username": <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>ThatServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/that/</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>UserServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/~{username}</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping> This is of course only one example, but this can be generalized to all situations where we want to resolve an actual URI to a resource depending on a mapping based on URI Templates. Is it an interesting use case for the WG? Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 17:54:21 UTC