- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:30:46 -0800
- To: "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>
hello. i have a technical question about HTTP and URIs. my use case is that i am considering to use HTTP for the resolution of non-HTTP URIs, so that for example (this is my use case) a geo:37.0625,-95.677068 URI could be "resolved" via HTTP. regardless of the actual process (what "resolution" returns in the response), i am currently just trying to find out whether it would be legal to send a HTTP request like this: GET geo:37.0625,-95.677068 HTTP/1.1 it seems to me that RFC 2616 does not prohibit such a use, but i am sure that a lot of people will dislike it for various reasons. however, currently i am just interested to figure out whether it's legal, and i think it is (not the geo: per se, which is not yet a standard, but the fact that there is a non-HTTP URI in the request). if i am mistaken, feedback would be greatly appreciated. thanks, erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814 dret@berkeley.edu - http://dret.net/netdret UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
Received on Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:31:22 UTC