- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:26:11 +0100
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com>, uri-review@ietf.org, public-html <public-html@w3.org>, URI <uri@w3.org>
On 09.02.2010 11:19, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> ...
>> Is that all that remains?
>
> I'm not aware of anything else.
> ...
One comment, one nit:
1)
"7. Relative "about" URIs
As "about" URIs do not use a hierarchical path, relative "about" URIs
are not permitted."
I think this is misleading.
A relative reference, as defined in
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.4.2>, does
not contain a URI scheme (by definition). So it's meaningless to talk
about the scheme of a reference.
In doubt, just drop the paragraph.
2) The spec talks a lot about reserved "about:" URIs, but does not state
how they can be reserved. I understand that there is no process for
that, and that this is by design, but maybe it should be stated more
clearly.
That being said, once the recent comments are addressed I would advise
to request publication.
Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 14:26:49 UTC