- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:55:10 +0900
- To: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- CC: "'Jamie Lokier'" <jamie@shareable.org>, uri-review@ietf.org, hybi@ietf.org, uri@w3.org, "'David Booth'" <david@dbooth.org>
Sorry to be very late with this. On 2009/08/12 19:15, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > 1. Encouraging the user to enter a Web Sockets URL does not make sense if > cross-domain connections are not allowed, which I hope will be the case (the > draft specification [1] does not contain security considerations). Could it be that the URI/IRI entered is sent to a server, where there are no cross-domain restrictions? > 2. While we are at it, a Web Sockets connection is useless without knowing > the protocol, and the protocol to be used is not contained within the URL. > That means a ws URL is not self-contained and thus useless as a stand-alone > locator. My understanding is that there is a Web Sockets protocol. Regards, Martin. -- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 06:56:17 UTC